Science blog
Map of the universe years in the making
Rogue bug may cause IVF failure
Technology decodes Alhambra inscriptions
Sonar causes deafness in dolphins
GM stem cells treat autoimmune disease
Nickel crash kick-started evolution
GPS inhalers track asthma triggers
Urban design turning kids off being active
Cleaning up oil spills can be bad for fish
Fluoro sensors to monitor recycled water
First cloned camel born in Dubai
Cephalopods share common toxic armoury
New evidence of aspirin risk for elderly
Salmonella vaccine could come from space
Porpoise-like sub swims with the current
Microbes thrive on iron under the ice
Blinking tower lights could save birds
Tradition can curb climate change: meeting
Coolest brown dwarf in universe found
'Silent' heart attacks quite common: study
World's land slipping in quality
Warning over 'natural' menopause therapies
Complex life pushed back in time
Lice may suppress asthma, allergies
  Warning over 'natural' menopause therapies
An Australian study has revealed that more women are dumping hormone replacement therapy in favour of untested alternatives to deal with menopause.

The authors of the study, which is published in the journal Climacteric, warn that such products are unproven for safety and efficacy and unapproved by national health authorities.

"Women often perceive that a product sold as being 'natural' must be safe and, if it is labelled 'bioidentical', it must have the identical beneficial effects of the registered hormone therapy," write the researchers, led by Profressor Alastair MacLennan of the Women's and Children's Hospital at the University of Adelaide.

"Few of those who buy these expensive products understand what they are taking, the relative lack of regulatory protection, and the potential for them to be misinformed, mistreated and misused."

The researchers interviewed 953 women over the age of 40 years in 2008 to find out what they were using to replace their loss of hormones.

The results were then compared against data collected in health surveys conducted in eight similar studies conducted between 1991 and 2004.

They found a sharp decline in both overall prevalence and length of use of conventional hormone replacement therapy (HRT) from 2003. The researchers attributed to the announcement in 2002 of a study which appeared to link HRT this to a higher risk of breast cancer, heart attack and stroke.

However, they noted that more recent studies pointing to the benefits of HRT and which revised downwards its risks, have not managed to bring women back to HRT.
Alternative increase

In 2004, 15.8% of women above the age of 50 years were using HRT, down from 22% in 2000. In 2004, use of "alternative hormonal therapies" was rare.

In 2008, conventional HRT use fell further for those over 50 years to 11.8%, but the number of women taking alternative untested hormonal therapies had risen to 4%.

"Most objective observers would agree that the risks of HRT were overstated following the early results of part of the US Women's Health Initiative study in 2002," says MacLennan.

"HRT is still the best way to treat debilitating menopausal symptoms for the vast majority of women. These scares have led to HRT use dropping, but for many women, the need for help through the menopause has not gone away, and so women are turning to those selling unproven and possibly dangerous alternatives."

Dr David Sturdee, president of the International Menopause Society, who did not participate in the study, says: "It's extremely important that women receive the correct treatment, rather than try something which may have no effect or may even be harmful.

"I'd urge women to contact their doctor before starting any treatment for menopause symptoms."
Roads kill more than malaria: study
Seagrass link to seahorse upright posture
Black band disease hits Great Barrier Reef
Hobbit feet reignite debate
Lizards soak up sunshine vitamin
Canada sequences swine flu virus
Termites are a miner's best friend
'Hide and seek' costly to HIV
Giant trilobites had complex social lives
Midnight sun too much for some
More toxics added to 'dirty dozen' list
Rogue galaxies prompt rethink on Newton
Acupuncture relieves back pain: study
Blazars shed light on black hole physics
Unfaithful offspring get head start
Daydreamers might solve problems faster
Coal supply may be vastly overestimated
Science and unis are winners in the budget
Heartbeat key for blood growth in embryos
Neck pain worse for women in the office
Busty figurine a 'Paleolithic Playboy'
Plant cells help bees get a grip
Space trio to give sharper view of cosmos
Sea creatures inspire CO2 sponge
Genetic link between period onset and BMI
Researchers find bacteria in clouds
Sustainable farm research 'under threat'
Tree leaves monitor pollution levels
Stay upright during labour, say experts
Antarctic ice growth linked to ozone hole
Fires fuelling global warming: study
Methane climate shock 'less likely'
Genome map reveals cow's genetic makeup
Microbe bubble machine stores energy
Stress gives reef fish wonky ears
Swine flu remains a mystery
Perception is in the ear of the beholder
Solar wind gives asteroids a tanning
Researchers find grain's memory gene
PET bottles potential health hazard
Researchers find first common autism gene
Fossil fuel use must fall to 25%: study
'WaveRider' poised for hypersonic flight
Big cuttlefish 'at risk' from desalination
Glaciers show north-south climate divide
Mobile phones help cardiac rehab
Dancing birds feel the beat
Mushrooms may yield vitamin D bonanza
Dingoes may be a native's best friend
Dud treatments more easily spread
U2 comet dust predates solar system
Australian CO2 delay sends 'mixed message'
Visit Statistics